camendesign.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the camendesign.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host camendesign.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Heart Internet Network .

the related websites

camendesign.com thelondoner.me pepysdiary.com proteinpow.com fashionvibe.net salaimartin.com searchenginewatch.com eu.finalfantasyxiv.com bmwguggenheimlab.org whatsamsawtoday.com thisisanfield.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.33 (Unix) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

all projects forum quote writing blog photo code art link poem audio web-dev annoyances eve code-is-art inspiration windows gift gaming mac osnews c64 linux older article → 12:57 am • 2018 mar 13 blog web-dev annoyances inspiration c share + remix unshaven yaks it’s unshaven yaks all the way down @4am nothing else i've come across has quite been able to explain the last 5 years of my programming and development work than this quote — what i've been doing personally for the last 5 years i will cover in another blog post soon, if you’ve just had the shock of your life seeing something new from me in your rss reader. it’s that kroc guy. a little explanation will be needed. firstly, “yak shaving” is when, in order to complete one task you have to do some other minor task first, which in turn relies on another task… and before you know it, you’re standing in a field shaving yaks. it’s the process of being so far removed from your original goal that you are busy doing something seemingly unrelated and have lost all sight of progress. combine this with “it’s turtles all the way down” and you have one of the most succinct ways in english to explain the phenomenon of attempting to develop a product, only to find that some dependency you rely on is not good enough and you have to replace it yourself, which then leads on to yet another dependency, and so on until you begin to consider “how difficult would it be to develop my own cpu?”. every time you peek under the current abstraction layer, you find that “computers are fractally awful”. things have to get worse before they can get better i've been away from web-development since 2013 and my, oh my, how things have gotten worse, haven’t they? actually, this is kind of to be expected, it happens in every industry. what we are seeing is the younger generation taking over from the old guard. those who were doing web-development in the ’90s are retiring or moving on and we’re seeing the result of a lot of fresh blood coming in and repeating all the mistakes of the past. what has changed — is different than the past — is that basic access to so much of the web is dependent on so many first-time programmers who literally don’t know the word “security”. although jquery is an immensely popular library, the fact that searching for “security” or “vulnerability” in the official learning centre returns “apologies, but nothing matched your search criteria” is an excellent summary of the state of javascript library security on the internet, circa august 2016. thou shalt not depend on me: analysing the use of outdated javascript libraries on the web that is not to say that i could do a better job — i expect many of the people behind the major javascript systems have cs degrees; i do not; i'm self taught and lack a mathematical background, but as someone who has striven for clean separation of presentation and logic , it’s the proliferation of a ‘javascript first’ mentality that saddens me the most. html does not need maintenance. it will still be readable, you will still be able to ‘get at it’ in a hundred years time, even if you have to write a parser to do so; but javascript? how will you know what any of it does in a hundred years time? what content will be lost, buried in all this nonsense? what do we have now? putting javascript aside entirely, things are actually really great. web browsers have gotten infinitely better in the last five years and the entire process of html / css specification and rollout to browsers is like a slow-moving but essentially unstoppable steam-roller. when i last updated this site , html5 was still a big ‘maybe’, hanging upon microsoft dragging their feet. i could not have predicted the microsoft we have now, back then. web-development news these days generally consists of: ‘here’s a chart of compatibility, microsoft isn’t on it.’ kroc camen, 29 th october 2009 heck, the site as it stands at the time of publishing still works in firefox 3.0 (we’re on version 59 right now) or camino 2.0 (do you remember that??) via specialised fall-back css! on camino 2.0 / mac, circa 2009 what do i have to prove now? nothing — you have to remember that when i first made this website, it was the most provocatively unflinching commentary on web-design at that time: dizzy. i’ve just read a whole damn website from a to z, including the source code. one night and my cognition changed. @riddle 6 th june 2009 1. v0.1 of the site did have one span, which was later removed 2. ids are used only for headings, no css is attached to them when everybody was poo-pooing html5 because “what about internet explorer?”, here i was publishing the first unashamedly html5 blog produced with no <div> s, no <span> s 1 , no javascript and no css ids 2 . i can safely say i had a website whose source code was prettier and nicer to read than many regular websites. view source = wow. code really can be art. @alex_gibson 19 th june 2009 that was what mattered then, but doesn’t matter now. the proliferation of javascript-first mentality and mobile devices / browsers has removed the accessibility and desire to view the original source code of web sites. you practically have to be a ‘developer’ with specialist ‘developer tools’ to view a website’s source code now; hardly inviting for the uninitiated. i was a lot more angry, inexperienced and defiant in those times. for the here and now i know that making something utterly bleeding edge that would only work correctly on 25% of devices would not prove anything these days — it’s not bleeding edge that the world needs now, it’s better quality engineering. the fear that finds us; the fear that binds us the point is that, with the mental and physical strain i've been under for the past five years, i've been paralysed with uncertainty and “hauptversionsnummernerhöhungsangst”: german for “the fear of increasing the major version number”. i got myself into a vicious-circle of being too afraid to put anything out that couldn’t be verifiably safe… and thus began the rabbit-hole that i would be falling down for the last five years. first, my templating methodology works with xml node trees, but because xpath doesn’t just ‘roll off the tongue’, we do some basic conversion of css to xpath. this was handled by a simple, ‘dumb’ search & replace function. in order to test the templating, i'm going to be relying on css to xpath translation, so i decide to migrate that to its own project / package and develop a fully css3-compliant, fail-proof css to xpath translator — full test-suite and all. but to test the css to xpath translator, i need to be able to both declare (in a compact, concise manner) and compare xml node trees to test the result of an xpath query against a ‘correct’ xml tree. since building, comparing, and tearing-down hundreds of miniature xml trees is anything but pleasant, i developed a very compact, highly regular (normalised) xml serialisation format (i'm actually quite proud of it, if i could finish it): <ul <li <a @href some.url | compact, serialized xml! >>> it ensures that, regardless of white-space differences, an xml node tree can be serialised into a string (easy to compare) or a string example (e.g. an expected test result) can be de-serialised into an xml node tree. with this, it is very easy to compare an xml node tree in memory (perhaps the result of a search / filter query) with a short and simple string describing an xml node tree. ok, but now we need to write a formal spec and test-suite for the xml serialisation format… look, i get the motivation behind test driven development , but it doesn’t work for a lone hobbyist programmer who ‘ain’t getting paid for this’. version numbers must be automated away humans cannot be trusted with version numbers. version numbers combine into one thing, two different concerns: human concerns, and machine concerns. to a machine, every api change is a major change; it’s an entirely different product as far as th

URL analysis for camendesign.co.uk

http://camendesign.co.uk///code/
http://camendesign.co.uk///mac/
http://camendesign.co.uk///.htaccess
http://camendesign.co.uk///windows/
http://camendesign.co.uk///blog/unshaven-yaks
http://camendesign.co.uk///web-dev/unshaven-yaks
http://camendesign.co.uk///inspiration/
http://camendesign.co.uk//blog/welcome/lofi.png
http://camendesign.co.uk//mailto:[email protected]
http://camendesign.co.uk///projects
http://camendesign.co.uk///design/
http://camendesign.co.uk///web-dev/
http://camendesign.co.uk///code-is-art/
http://camendesign.co.uk///dom_templating
http://camendesign.co.uk///poem/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
camendesign.co.uk

Registrant:
Camen Design

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.

Data validation:
Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or address against a 3rd party source

Registrar:
LCN.com Ltd [Tag = LCN]
URL: http://www.lcn.com

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 01-Jul-2004
Expiry date: 01-Jul-2024
Last updated: 01-Jul-2014

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns1.mainnameserver.com
ns2.mainnameserver.com

WHOIS lookup made at 18:14:52 26-Jul-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS camendesign.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Camen Design

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
Data validation:
Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or address against a 3rd party source

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR LCN.com Ltd [Tag = LCN]

  CREATED 2004-07-01

  CHANGED 2014-07-01

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS1.MAINNAMESERVER.COM 79.170.40.2

  NS2.MAINNAMESERVER.COM 79.170.43.3

  NAME camendesign.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .